Know who actually did the work
Remote pipelines face proxy candidates and identity fraud. SkillFoundry turns behavioral signals into integrity review prompts — decision-support with a human in the loop, never an auto-reject.
How it works
Provenance built on behavioral signal
The same event stream that powers scoring becomes tamper-evident evidence — without webcams, biometrics, or keystroke content.
Tamper-evident trail
Every session is hash-chained and signed. Post-hoc edits are detectable — the evidence trail holds up when a hiring decision is questioned.
Behavioral authorship signature
A deterministic fingerprint from edit cadence, paste bursts, and timing rhythms — shapes, not content. No webcams, no keystroke logging.
Human-in-the-loop review
Signals surface to reviewers as decision-support. Nothing auto-rejects. Every confirm or dismiss requires a documented reason.
Signals you can understand
Three integrity finding types
Each signal links to evidence refs in the session trail. Reviewers confirm or dismiss with a required reason.
Cadence shift
Editing rhythm changed sharply mid-session. This can indicate external help or a context switch — review the evidence trail before drawing conclusions.
Large paste after idle
A large paste followed a long idle gap. This may indicate copied work — confirm with session replay and other signals.
Cross-session style mismatch
This session’s interaction-timing fingerprint differs from the candidate’s prior sessions. It may indicate a different person completed this stage — use as a review prompt, not a verdict.
For your organization
How authenticity helps hiring teams
Integrity signals complement orchestration scores and benchmarks — they answer 'was this work actually done by this person?'
Defeat proxy candidates
Cross-session style mismatches and cadence shifts prompt review when the person doing the work may not be the person you are hiring.
Review prompts, not verdicts
A paste after idle or cadence break is a signal to investigate — paired with session replay and test results, not an automatic rejection.
Protect candidate trust
Candidates are never shown raw flags as accusations. Reviewers document reasoning; dismissed signals stay on the audit trail.
Demo mode
This page uses canned integrity data. The panels below are the same IntegrityPanel reviewers see on submission detail — reviewer actions are read-only in this demo.
What you are looking at
Panel 1 shows a session with two unreviewed signals — a cadence shift and a large paste after idle. Panel 2 shows a dismissed cross-session mismatch with reviewer notes. Panel 3 shows a clean session with an authorship fingerprint but no flags.
Panel 1
Signals needing review
Alex Chen's pagination session — cadence shift and paste-after-idle flagged for human review.
Integrity review
Decision-support signals only — not an accusation and never an auto-reject. Confirm or dismiss each signal with a documented reason. Consider a verified live round or appeal path when appropriate.
Authorship fingerprint v2.1 computed 6/28/2026, 3:10:00 PM.
5 cadence/timing features · cross-session threshold 0.72
Cadence shift
Editing rhythm changed sharply mid-session. This can indicate external help or a context switch — review the evidence trail before drawing conclusions.
Large paste after idle
A large paste followed a long idle gap. This may indicate copied work — confirm with session replay and other signals.
Panel 2
Reviewed and dismissed
A cross-session mismatch reviewed with documented reasoning — the audit trail preserves the decision.
Integrity review
Decision-support signals only — not an accusation and never an auto-reject. Confirm or dismiss each signal with a documented reason. Consider a verified live round or appeal path when appropriate.
Authorship fingerprint v2.1 computed 6/20/2026, 11:05:00 AM.
5 cadence/timing features · cross-session threshold 0.72
Cross-session style mismatch
This session’s interaction-timing fingerprint differs from the candidate’s prior sessions. It may indicate a different person completed this stage — use as a review prompt, not a verdict.
Reviewer note: Replay shows consistent problem-solving approach; timing shift explained by debugging pause.
Panel 3
Clean session
Authorship fingerprint on file, no integrity signals flagged for review.
Integrity review
Decision-support signals only — not an accusation and never an auto-reject. Confirm or dismiss each signal with a documented reason. Consider a verified live round or appeal path when appropriate.
Authorship fingerprint v2.1 computed 6/15/2026, 4:40:00 PM.
5 cadence/timing features · cross-session threshold 0.72
No integrity signals flagged for human review on this session.
Ready to add provenance to your hiring pipeline?
Integrity signals run automatically on every instrumented session — reviewers decide what to act on.