Interactive demo

Stop debating what a score means

Abstract numbers don't drive hiring decisions. SkillFoundry benchmarks every candidate against your own team — overall, by dimension, and on AI orchestration. Scroll down to see the same panel reviewers see.

Canned candidate dataSame view as reviewersNo login required

How it works

Your bar, applied to every candidate

Benchmarking reframes every result: not 'they scored 84' but 'they exceed most of your backend engineers on this task.'

1

Calibrate your cohort

Your engineers complete the same assessment instrument candidates take. Their scores form the reference cohort — with consent.

2

Score every candidate

Each submission gets an overall score plus dimension and AI-orchestration sub-scores — the same rubric for everyone.

3

Read percentiles, not abstractions

"82nd percentile vs. your backend team" is actionable. A bare 84/100 is not — unless you know what your team typically scores.

What you can read

Every percentile tells a story

Hiring committees use these comparisons to decide whether someone clears the standard your best engineers set.

Overall percentile

Where this candidate sits against your calibrated engineering team on the composite score.

Example: 82nd percentile — stronger than most of your backend engineers on this task

Dimension breakdown

See whether they are strong on code quality, correctness, tests, or behavioral signals — not just the headline number.

Example: Verification discipline: 88th percentile

AI orchestration vs. team

Compare delegation, verification, recovery, and judgment against engineers who already work with AI on your stack.

Example: Exceeds 9 of 12 backend engineers on AI orchestration

Fairness guardrails

Comparisons are withheld when the cohort is too small or an adverse-impact check flags the population.

Example: Frontend cohort (5 engineers) — comparison unavailable until 8+ consented members

Demo mode

This page uses canned benchmark data. The panels below are the same CohortBenchmarkPanel reviewers see on evaluated submissions — nothing is simulated on the frontend beyond the sample dataset.

Panel 1

Healthy benchmark cohort

Alex Chen scored 84/100 on a pagination task. Against your 12-person backend cohort, that translates to an 82nd-percentile overall — and exceeds 9 of 12 on AI orchestration.

Team benchmark

vs your team (12 engineers)

Overall

82nd

Overall score84/100 · 82nd

Score dimensions

Code quality74th percentile
Correctness88th percentile
Test coverage68th percentile
Behavior79th percentile

AI orchestration

AI orchestrationexceeds 10/12
Delegation quality78th percentile
Verification discipline88th percentile
Failure recovery90th percentile
Judgment80th percentile

Decision-support only — percentiles compare this candidate to your calibrated engineering team, not a pass/fail bar.

Panel 2

When comparisons are withheld

SkillFoundry fails closed. Small cohorts and adverse-impact flags suppress percentile views rather than showing misleading comparisons.

Team benchmark

Benchmark unavailable — need at least 8 consented engineers in "Frontend team" (currently 5).

Team benchmark

Benchmark comparison withheld: adverse impact detected for Female (sex) (four-fifths rule). Consult your compliance team before using percentile comparisons.

Ready to benchmark candidates against your own engineers?

Calibration takes one assessment per reference engineer. After that, every candidate result includes percentile context.